CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue WatchvsMaen Manhattan 37 Worn & Wound Edition
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue Watch vs Maen Manhattan 37 Worn & Wound Edition gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely report the CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue Watch as very hard-wearing, with good seconds hand alignment and perfect bezel alignment with crisp action. The lume is described as pretty good despite fauxtina, and the watch gains approximately 3 seconds per month. Some owners consider the CWC 1987 SBS Quartz Diver Re-Issue Watch overpriced, while others appreciate its bombproof, toolish design and military heritage.
Owners widely report the Maen Manhattan 37 Worn & Wound Edition offers exceptional build quality for its price point, often seen as a step above other microbrands in the $500 range. Reviewers highlight its pared-down, dressy design with fumé dials and stripped-down indices, noting the bracelet finishing appears strong for its $899 cost. The use of a Sellita SW 200-1 movement is considered a fine compromise for affordability, and its 9.3mm thickness is a notable wearability feature. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Maen Manhattan 37 Worn & Wound Edition highly for its superior finishing and design at its price.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.