Side by side

Ikepod Horopod HO01vsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Horopod HO01
IkepodHoropod HO01
MSRP $3,445
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Horopod HO0144mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Horopod HO0140h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Horopod HO01100m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Horopod HO01$3,445
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
44mm
38mm
Thickness
12mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
44mm
42mm
Material
Titanium
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
100m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Black
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
ETA 2824
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$3,445
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Ikepod Horopod HO01 vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Ikepod Horopod HO01

The Ikepod Horopod HO01 is widely praised for its comfortable, lightweight titanium build and futuristic design. Owners appreciate its unique case shape and the grey dial with orange hands and lume ring. The watch features a 44mm titanium case that wears smaller, an Op Art dial with a series of holes, and an ETA 2824 automatic movement with a 38-hour power reserve. Some owners find precise time-setting difficult, with one reporting the watch gaining about +5 seconds in 18 hours, and the lume is noted as serviceable rather than bright. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Ikepod Horopod HO01 highly for its comfortable, futuristic titanium design at its price point.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.