Side by side

Ikepod Seapod SOO3vsTissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Seapod SOO3
IkepodSeapod SOO3
MSRP $1,369
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
TissotSeastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
MSRP $1,375

At a glance

11 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Seapod SOO346mm
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT46mm
Power Reserve
Seapod SOO340h
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT80h
Water Resistance
Seapod SOO3100m
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT300m
MSRP
Seapod SOO3$1,369
Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT$1,375

Full specifications

Case

4 specs
Category
Diver
GMT
Thickness
12mm
15.4mm
Lug Width
20mm
22mm
Water Resistance
100m
300m

Crystal & Dial

4 specs
Crystal Shape
Flat
Domed
AR Coating
Inner
Yes
Indices
Applied
Indexes
Lume
Yes
Super-LumiNova ®

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9039
Powermatic 80
Power Reserve
40h
80h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,369
$1,375

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Ikepod Seapod SOO3 vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Ikepod Seapod SOO3

The Ikepod Seapod SOO3 is lauded for its symmetrical, time-only dial and unique, lugless case design that enhances wearability despite its 46mm size. Reviewers note the lume is less potent than desired, and the hands could be larger for improved legibility. The Miyota 9039 movement powers the watch, which offers 200m water resistance, though its gripless bezel and fixed strap reduce its practicality for actual diving. On balance, reviewers highlight the Ikepod Seapod SOO3 as a design-forward piece with a distinctive aesthetic.

Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT

Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT for its excellent build quality, smooth winding feel, and the reliable Powermatic 80 movement providing an 80-hour power reserve. Reviewers highlight its remarkable value under $700, comfortable wearability, and appealing case/dial ratio. Some owners note the bezel's functionality for tracking a second time zone and the need to adjust the hour hand for date setting, a characteristic of its "True" GMT function. The rubber strap is considered comparable to those found on significantly more expensive watches. However, concerns exist regarding the movement's serviceability due to potential plastic components and reliance on Swatch Group service centers. Some find the bezel font and dial spacing unappealing, while others question the mineral glass bezel insert as a cost-cutting measure compared to ceramic. Accuracy is generally reported as good, though not COSC certified, and lume intensity is described as average by one owner.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.