Oris Aquis Date DiamondsvsGlycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Oris Aquis Date Diamonds vs Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Oris Aquis Date Diamonds for its quality, value, and versatile design, with the glossy dial and ceramic bezel noted for playing with light, and the diamonds offering an interesting contrast. The comfortable integrated bracelet and rubber strap are frequently highlighted, as is the solid build and pleasing crown detail. Some owners find the 36mm size offers a substantial feel, while others note the 39.5mm variant's thickness and the amount of polished surfaces. Accuracy is reported as excellent, with one owner seeing +1 second per day. The Sellita SW 200-1 based Caliber 733 movement has a 38-hour power reserve. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Oris Aquis Date Diamonds highly for its distinctive design and solid build quality at its price point.
Owners widely praise the Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic for its exceptional thinness at 10.4mm for a 42mm diver, perfect proportions for small wrists, and unique, non-homage aesthetic, with some considering it the best dive watch under $400 due to its superior finishing and value. The case shape, dimensions, and drilled lugs are also highlighted as positives, and the dial is legible with good lume on the hands. However, reviewers and owners consistently flag sub-par lume on the markers that fades quickly, and an inconsistent power reserve. Some owners report the stock strap or bracelet is subpar, and one owner experienced the bezel detaching after a light bump, questioning build quality. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner noting it runs about 2.5 seconds fast per day, while another reports an inconsistent power reserve. On balance, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic highly for its thinness, unique design, and value, despite concerns about lume and strap quality.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











